A working method
Approach
How to keep a disagreement empirical.
Before evidence can settle a disagreement, agree on the claim, what counts as evidence, and what would change your mind.
-
01
Define the question.
State the question and the decision it affects. Define the terms, who or what you are studying, and the time frame. Set a baseline for comparison.
-
02
Make the measure explicit.
Name the outcome and how you will measure it. Give the denominator and the threshold for success. If the dispute concerns definitions or values, say so.
-
03
Ask before asserting.
Ask which assumptions each explanation needs. Give competing explanations their strongest form. A claim is clearer when its alternatives are clear.
-
04
Keep the record separable.
Record what you observed separately from how you interpret it. Label forecasts and compare them with outcomes. State value judgments explicitly.
-
05
Preserve uncertainty.
Report ranges and base rates. Show how estimates change with their assumptions, and name what remains unknown. Precision is not the same as accuracy.
-
06
Make revision possible.
State what would change your mind. If nothing could, the disagreement is not empirical; it is a conflict of commitments.
-
07
Prefer robust action.
Choose actions that work across several plausible futures. Monitor their effects and leave room to change course.